So it's one more day before the test in project management. All well so far. The old tests feels not impossible and I might as well make it pretty good. Of course I have said it before like in the statistic course (bloody *******). On the other hand I think I know what the problem might be, I don't describe enough why I use the calculation that answers the question. Of course this is a constant problem seen in other tests as well where I might be satisfied with 1 sentence as an answer to a question. It's enough but I surely miss out on those small details that awards you with extra point. I guess it's from the fact that I prefer large brushes of information that small nitpicking touches on a painting. The advantage is that I have a vast knowledge about many things and can use it in association with other areas.
Of course it's deeply flawed in a debate with someone that really knows his/her stuff around this, but seen by the latest "wikipedia knowledge" around todays people I think I might go far. And you can always fake a higher degree of knowing. Yes, I can do that sometimes, until someone challenges me. Then I get really confused and don't know in our out and then the illusion falls and the magician is brought out into the light to be judged. And usually I'm at fault here. Somehow I once got confused over who was who in Led Zeppelin. And that's Led Zeppelin with just 4-5 members, compared to Black Sabbath with 25. Hope that doesn' affect my ability to write the test on Wednesday.
No, I'm not high on chocolate while writing this, why do you ask? Actually that's a funny story as last Friday we had a discussion if it was called a chocolate or an chocolate (in Swedish of course meaning if it was "ett choklad eller en choklad"). What do you mean I could have spent my time better in the library then discussing chocolate for 2 hours? Don't say it like that! I need some chocolate and...they close at 9 p.m and it's 10 p.m now? Damn you. I just have to start with coffee again.
Of course it's deeply flawed in a debate with someone that really knows his/her stuff around this, but seen by the latest "wikipedia knowledge" around todays people I think I might go far. And you can always fake a higher degree of knowing. Yes, I can do that sometimes, until someone challenges me. Then I get really confused and don't know in our out and then the illusion falls and the magician is brought out into the light to be judged. And usually I'm at fault here. Somehow I once got confused over who was who in Led Zeppelin. And that's Led Zeppelin with just 4-5 members, compared to Black Sabbath with 25. Hope that doesn' affect my ability to write the test on Wednesday.
No, I'm not high on chocolate while writing this, why do you ask? Actually that's a funny story as last Friday we had a discussion if it was called a chocolate or an chocolate (in Swedish of course meaning if it was "ett choklad eller en choklad"). What do you mean I could have spent my time better in the library then discussing chocolate for 2 hours? Don't say it like that! I need some chocolate and...they close at 9 p.m and it's 10 p.m now? Damn you. I just have to start with coffee again.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar